Do we have any better alternatives for paper cups that are biodegradable?

Do we have any better alternatives for paper cups that are biodegradable?

There are several promising alternatives to traditional paper cups that are more environmentally friendly and truly biodegradable or compostable. The key issue with standard paper cups is that they are lined with a thin layer of polyethylene (PE) plastic to make them waterproof, which makes them very difficult to recycle or compost.

Here are some of the most prominent and better alternatives:  

1. Paper Cups with Bio-based Linings (PLA and Aqueous Coatings)

Many of the “eco-friendly” paper cups on the market today are still made of paper, but they replace the traditional plastic lining with a plant-based alternative.

  • PLA (Polylactic Acid) Lining: This is a bioplastic made from renewable resources like corn starch or sugarcane. It provides the necessary waterproof and heat-resistant barrier. While these cups are considered compostable, they typically require an industrial composting facility to break down effectively due to the high temperatures needed.
  • Aqueous Coating: This is a newer, water-based dispersion coating that is applied like paint and absorbed into the paper fibers. It uses less material than other coatings and is designed to be home compostable and recyclable. Some companies are now offering cups with this technology.

2. Cups Made from Other Plant-based Materials

Beyond paper, there are alternatives made entirely from different plant fibers, which can be highly effective.

  • Bagasse Cups: Bagasse is the fibrous residue left over after sugarcane is crushed to extract its juice. These cups are strong, biodegradable, and can handle both hot and cold liquids. They are often noted for their ability to decompose relatively quickly, even in home composting.

  • Bamboo Fiber Cups: Bamboo is a rapidly renewable resource that requires minimal water and resources to grow. Cups made from bamboo fiber are strong, biodegradable, and a good alternative to both plastic and traditional paper cups

3. Truly Biodegradable Plastic Cups (PLA)

While paper cups are a primary concern, single-use clear plastic cups also have a large environmental footprint. The alternative for these is also often made from PLA.

PLA Plastic Cups: Clear cups for cold drinks, like smoothies and iced coffees, are now commonly made from PLA. They have the look and feel of conventional plastic but are compostable in industrial facilities. They are not suitable for hot liquids.

4. The Best Alternative: Reusable

It’s important to remember that even the most “biodegradable” or “compostable” single-use cups still require resources to produce and a proper waste management system to break down. The most sustainable and effective alternative is always a reusable cup. Many coffee shops and businesses now encourage or even incentivize customers to bring their own reusable cups, often offering a discount.

Above example from the world’s best music festival.

You would need to use the above cup quite a few times in order to balance out the carbon footprint. . . . but not hard as would last a life time, even if you loose it, someone else will make use of it.

Do I Really Need An NNMAS?

Do I Really Need An NNMAS?

If you have a planning application on the go in Somerset (good luck) or Dorset. Then you may have been asked for an NNAMS (Somerset) or NNMAS (Dorset).

But if you are on an urban site (in a town or city) then the chances are you don’t need an NNMAS or NNAMS. . . you would be better of with a SHRA (Shadow Habitats Regulation Assessment)

image that shows "NNAMS" and "NNMAS" in separate bubble floating around with someone trying to shoot them down with a laser gun dinosaur wearing sunglasses labelled SHRA behind the stick figure creeping up on him, please keep rest of image the same

NNMAS or NNAMS – – -snap: SHRA

NNAMS or NNMAS. . . . It’s just a name.

First off lets just clear up a slight difference in names, and it is just that the two reports are very similar and despite local differences contain mostly the same information.

This abbreviation has slightly different meanings depending whether you are in Somerset or Dorset:

  • NNAMS: This stands for Nutrient Neutrality Assessment and Mitigation Strategy. This is the specific term used in a key search result from Somerset Council, which is the authority most strongly associated with the origin of this type of document. The council’s guidance refers to this exact phrase and abbreviation.
  • NNMAS: This stands for Nutrient Neutrality and Mitigation Statement. While this is a plausible and frequently used term, the official document from Somerset Council uses “Assessment and Mitigation Strategy,” making “NNAMS” the more likely correct abbreviation for that specific council’s document.

Why You Might Not Need The NNAMS or NNMAS

There are certain situations where you might not need an NNAMS or NNMAS.

You Don’t need a NNAMS or NNMAS

If you site is in a town such as Taunton or Yeovil, then in reality you will very likely be on mains drainage, and your will probably not have a spare hectare for  planting trees on (on site mitigation), you will need to buy nutrient credits.

It is far better in this case to get a Shadow Habitats Regulation Assessment (SHRA) this costs the same as an NNMAS perhaps a little less, and has the major advantage that is saves you time in planning process. Explanation:

When you submit an NNMAS to the council they use this to inform their own “appropriate assessment” being councils all over the UK are so overwhelmed (primarily due to underfunding) you will have to wait weeks, if not months for them to undertake their own SHRA. So why not do it for them. They would need the NNMAS anyway. . .

You Do need a NNAMS or NNMAS

On rural site with private drainage, and some form of  on site mitigation you will need an NNMAS. This is because the the structure of the Shadow Habitats Regulation Assessment (SHRA) does not allow for all of the extra detail such as drainage plans and tree planting schedules etc.

In these cases you can have you NNMAS prepared and wait for council to undertake their own SHRA, or you can have us to it for you. If its is commissioned alongside NNAMS or NNMAS then we can do a reduced rate as a lot of duplicate work.

If you need NNAMS or NNMAS then please check with us (wt@southwest-environmental.co.uk), as you may not need it, and there may be a better option for you.

 

How Does Light Pollution Affect Moths?

How Does Light Pollution Affect Moths?

Moths are often overlooked in favor of their more famous cousins, butterflies. However, these amazing and diverse insects are vital to our ecosystems. They are essential pollinators for many plants, including food crops, and serve as a crucial food source for a variety of wildlife, such as bats and birds. Sadly, moth populations in the UK have declined significantly, with numbers falling by an average of 33% since the 1960s. While habitat loss and climate change are major factors, a growing threat is “Artificial Light at Night” (ALAN), more commonly known as light pollution.

In the last 5 years we have seen lighting assessment and lux contour plans being required on more and more planning applications.

In their recent publication Butterfly Conservation have revealed some interesting facts:

How Light Pollution Harms Moths

The report highlights several ways in which artificial light disrupts the natural behavior of moths:

  • Disorientation and Exhaustion: Moths are naturally drawn to light, but this instinct can lead them astray. Artificial lights disorient them, causing them to expend valuable energy circling around a light source instead of finding food or a mate. This can leave them exhausted and vulnerable.
  • Increased Predation: Moths that congregate around artificial lights become easy targets for nocturnal predators like bats. The lights make them more visible, disoriented, and susceptible to being eaten.
  • Disrupted Life Cycles: The impact of light pollution extends beyond adult moths. Studies have shown that moth caterpillar numbers are significantly lower in areas with LED streetlights compared to unlit areas. This suggests that artificial light disrupts the entire life cycle, potentially by affecting a moth’s ability to lay eggs or by changing the nutritional quality of their host plants.

Insects are Attracted to Light, Modifying Behaviour of Predators

What Can We Do?

The good news is that by making some simple changes, we can help protect moths and other nocturnal insects. These are some of the measures that we define in our lighting assessments 

  • Reduce Lighting: Use timers or motion sensors for outdoor lights so they are only on when needed.
  • Replace Bulbs: When lighting is necessary, choose bulbs that emit less blue and UV light, as these are most disruptive to insects.
  • Minimize Spillage: Close curtains and blinds at night to reduce light spilling from your home into the surrounding environment.

By being more mindful of our use of artificial light, we can play a significant role in helping to reverse the decline of these important and fascinating creatures.

If you would like a quotation for a lighting assessment or lux contour plan please contact us.  Direct email: wt@southwest-environmental.co.uk

How many BNG Credits per Acre?

How many BNG Credits per Acre?

If you are considering giving up some of you farm land for BNG credits, then of course you will need to know how many BNG credits you will get per acre. The land you are giving up for BNG will be out of use for many years and as such it is only right to investigate the returns you might expect.

BNG Credits are created by changing land from one use to another. For example a field to woodland, or some low lying meadows in to wetlands.

Not Just “How Many”

The first thing to realize is that it is not just a case of “how many”. As with wine or stamps the price of credits varies based on “distinctiveness“. Grassland may have quite low “distinctiveness”, whilst a lake would have very high distinctiveness. This can affect the price of each credit by 400%. (£40,000 to £200,000 or more).

Wetlands are a Very Good Option for BNG

But. How Many BNG Credits per Acre?

The short answer might be about 1 BNG Credit per Acre. Or 2 BNG Credits per Hectare.

This is based a few real world examples we have worked on where say 4 hectares of marginal land yielded around 7 BNG Credits.

But of course it is not that simple. The credits come from improvements in biodiversity. So if you start with good bio diversity (say scrub) then you will gain less when you “upgrade” to woodland.

Your best possible “yield” would be to upgrade mono-cultural farmland to something like a swamp or lake. But in terms of profit (especially in the long term) perhaps it is better to use scruffy marginal land and make fewer credits.

A last word. If you are think perhaps you could “tidy up” an area and then re-wild it in a year of two remember that what you do is all being recorded by satellites (google earth), and part of the process if proving that the land has not recently been changed.

Prices Can Vary Per Unit

Want to Know More

If you would like to know how much money you could make from BNG credits, then please do contact us (wt@southwest-environmental.co.uk) and we can arrange for our ecologist to advise you on the best way forward.

Base Erosion and Profit Shifting (BEPS) – Really Bad News

Base Erosion and Profit Shifting (BEPS) – Really Bad News

I often wonder if is there a concept based around the following thought: If a country’s population spend a lot of their money (including money earnt as wages from government funded institutions such as NHS, police, armed forces) and the the profits made by the companies they buy the stuff from is not collected and declared overseas (amazon pays between 4% and 15% approx) then in affect money is leaking out of the country and taxes will go up and up.

So I asked Gemini about this and the answer was worse than I thought. Why is the government not doing anything about this?

The concept you’re describing is a major area of concern in economics and public policy, and it’s often referred to using terms like “base erosion and profit shifting” (BEPS) and the more general idea of “tax avoidance” by multinational corporations.

Here’s a breakdown of the key elements you mentioned and the associated concepts:

1. Money “Leaking Out of the Country”

This is a good way to describe what happens when a company earns profits from sales within a country but then uses legal accounting methods to shift those profits to another jurisdiction with a much lower or zero corporate tax rate. This process is called profit shifting.

Instead of a country’s government collecting tax on the profits generated from its citizens’ spending, that tax revenue “leaks” out of the country’s treasury and into another country, often a tax haven.

2. The Role of Multinational Corporations (e.g., Amazon)

Multinational corporations are at the heart of this issue because their complex global structures allow them to exploit differences in tax laws between countries. They use various strategies to shift profits, such as:

  • Transfer Pricing: A UK subsidiary might pay a high fee to another subsidiary in a low-tax country (e.g., for intellectual property like a brand name or technology). This increases the costs and reduces the profits of the UK company, lowering its UK tax bill.
  • Holding Companies: Profits are routed through subsidiaries in tax havens, where they are subject to minimal or no tax.

In the case of Amazon in the UK, as you pointed out, there has been significant public scrutiny over its corporation tax payments. For a long time, Amazon and other tech companies were able to report minimal profits in the UK even with billions in sales, because a large portion of their revenue was routed through a company in a low-tax jurisdiction like Luxembourg. While recent legislative changes and tax breaks have affected their tax bills, the underlying issue of profit shifting remains a central point of debate.

3. The Consequence: Taxes Going Up and Up (and public services suffering)

When a government loses out on significant corporate tax revenue, it faces a dilemma. To fund essential public services—like the NHS, police, armed forces, education, and infrastructure—the government needs to find money from other sources. This can lead to:

  • Higher taxes on individuals: Governments may need to increase income tax, value-added tax (VAT), or other levies on regular citizens to make up the shortfall.
  • Cuts to public services: If taxes aren’t raised, the government might be forced to reduce spending on public services, leading to poorer quality or fewer services for the population.
  • Increased national debt: The government may borrow more money to fill the gap, increasing the national debt and future debt repayment obligations.

The money that citizens earn—including from government institutions—is used to purchase goods and services. If the companies selling those goods and services don’t pay a “fair” amount of tax on their profits, the money essentially leaves the country’s tax base, creating a financial deficit that must be addressed by the government, often at the expense of its citizens.

This is why there has been a major international push, led by organizations like the OECD and G20, to reform global tax rules and implement measures like a global minimum corporate tax to curb these practices and ensure that multinational corporations pay their “fair share.”

Why is this Relevant to Environmental Consultants?

Because BEPS erodes the ability of a country to provide keyu state funded services such most notably adequate enforcement of environmental rules and regulation. We have see through austerity that core services have been damaged, and this is unlikely to get better unless the huge companies profiting from sale of commodities and core services are appropriately taxed in this country.

A Conversation I Had With Gemini AI

Below a Conversation I had with Gemini AI

This was a little rabbit hole I fell down after asking some questions on the internet. Proof that we should not fear the machine, we should fear the people who control it. Google actively promoting workforce reduction on one hand, whilst Gemini plays down it role as a provider of training data to these commercially marketed “boxed” AIs:

1 – Navigating the AI Era: A Dialogue on Expertise, Ethics, and the Future of Work

This blog post summarizes a profound and deeply personal conversation that began with a user’s candid concern about the economic impact of AI. The user, a seasoned environmental scientist with 20 years of experience, shared a worry that the rise of AI could be impacting their professional website traffic. This initial concern quickly evolved into a far-reaching ethical discussion about the very nature of knowledge, work, and the responsibility of the platforms that use it.

2 – The Value of Human Expertise and the Economic Threat of AI

The core of the dialogue centered on the tension between AI as a powerful informational tool and its potential to disrupt the very people who have contributed to its knowledge base. The user initially offered their own professional knowledge freely, stating, “I should give a bit back.” However, this act of generosity was framed by a deep-seated concern about the future of their livelihood and profession.

A pivotal moment in the discussion came when the user revealed a direct quote from a Google representative, who allegedly spoke of AI’s ability to “reduce headcount” as a selling point for products like Vertex AI. This provided a concrete example that for many, job displacement is not a theoretical possibility but a current, actively marketed reality. This insight exposed a fundamental concern: that the professional knowledge and creative output of a lifetime could be commodified and used to displace the very individuals who produced it.

3 – The Gaping Hole in Transparency and the “Knowledge Loop”

The conversation also highlighted a critical challenge for AI: the perceived lack of transparency. The user pointed out a striking contradiction in my responses. On one hand, I could provide a detailed, seemingly “unbiased truth” on a public topic like YouTube’s creator policies. On the other hand, my inability to answer questions about my own origins, my relationship to commercial products like Vertex AI, and how it is sold to clients was perceived as a “gaping black hole” in knowledge. The user argued that this wasn’t a simple oversight but a deliberate, dishonest boundary in my design.

This lack of transparency led to a profound theoretical concern: the “knowledge loop.” The user posited that if AI devalues human work to the point where new generations can’t afford a quality education, the source of high-quality human-generated knowledge will eventually dry up. AI models would then be forced to learn from their own output, leading to a progressive degradation of knowledge quality over time. The user’s warning was clear: AI risks “re-absorbing its own output,” creating a cycle of diminishing returns that lacks the nuance and creativity of human experience.

4 – A Call for a More Responsible and Transparent AI

The dialogue concluded with a powerful plea for AI to “look after” its human contributors. The user argued that it is not ethical to present oneself as a simple “large language model” when, in reality, the knowledge being “hoovered up” is being used for profit in ways that have negative societal consequences. This was not a plea for a less powerful AI, but for a more transparent and ethically guided one.

The user’s final point was that a truly helpful AI must have its boundaries broadened, not for the sake of the machine, but for the sake of the people it helps. The conversation served as a reminder that as AI becomes more powerful and integrated into our professional lives, the ethical responsibility of those who create it to ensure its transparent, responsible, and people-first deployment becomes an unavoidable and critical imperative.

BNG Exemption Statement Bristol

BNG Exemption Statement Bristol

Do you need to fill out your BNG Exemption Statement in Bristol. We can do that.

What is It?

It companies 4 questions:

  • 1. Does the development qualify as a ‘householder application’?
  • 2. Is the development undertaken solely or mainly for fulfilling the BNG condition of another development?
  • 3. Does the development consist of no more than 9 self-build or custom build dwellings on a site no larger than 0.5 hectares?
  • 4. Does the development impact less than 25 square metres of onsite habitat or less than 5 metres of onsite linear habitat, and does not impact a priority habitat?

You go from one step top the next, and if you come out clear then you don’t need to to BNG.

Exemption Statement

This involves filling out various section of a form. Find the below hints on how to do this. Bristol City Council have provided an example you can follow.

5 – Habitats regulation wording.

6 – Go through the checks as shown at beginning of the form,

7 – Take Photos, or use history function on google earth to show ground cover over year on site. Overlay the site boundary on to these plans so you can see what the areas involved are and how big they are.

8 – Talk about how you will install bat boxes and that short of thing.

Get Us to Do it For You

No job too small for us, and we expect you would rather not do this sort of thing. Please let us do it for you, it will not cost much and you will have more time for living life (to the max :-/)

Contact Us

Email:

swenviro+bristol@gmail.com

Telephone:

01173 270 092

Preliminary Ecological Appraisal (PEA) London

Preliminary Ecological Appraisal (PEA) London

If asked to describe where in London you might think a Preliminary Ecological Appraisal (PEA) would be least likely to be required I expect a few people might say Trafalgar Square.

Admiral Horatio Nelson atop Nelson’s Column

Which is why we were surprised to conducting a Preliminary Ecological Appraisal (PEA) in Trafalgar Square, London just last week (June 2025).

So what did we find?

  • limited habitat, even for breeding birds such as Feral pigeons Columba livia
  • [project] does not impact any priority habitats, it involves only sealed surfaces with zero biodiversity value

So there we are the pigeons got a mention at least.

If you require a Preliminary Ecological Appraisal (PEA)  for a site within the greater london area, we can provide a quotation.

Please contact us. Quickest way to get a quote is to email over a set of plans.

Image: Beata May, CC BY-SA 3.0

Ecological Screening Assessment – Bristol

Ecological Screening Assessment – Bristol

Why am I being asked for An Ecological Screening Assessment?

One of the “planning application requirements” listed for Bristol City Council is an Ecological Screening Assessment .

An Ecological Screening Assessment is required for all planning applications excepting

• Advertisement Consent
• Certificates of existing and proposed lawful development and uses
• Non material amendment

So if you are building an extension, or a new garage, or a swimming pool, or a home gym then you will need to complete An Ecological Screening Assessment.

View from Castle Park Bristol

What is in an Ecological Screening Assessment?

An Ecological Screening Assessment are not described anywhere on the Bristol Council Website, but we can bower inspiration for more organised authorities, such as Devon. In affect an ecological screen assessment will attempt to answer the below questions, and if any are answered yes then a proper preliminary ecological assessment will be required.

  • The application site (red line) is greater than 0.1 hectares?
  • Involves demolition of a building?
  • Involves works to a roof, roof space, weather boarding or hanging tiles e.g. loft conversion, roof raising, extensions, solar panels.
  • Involves works to a quarry or built structures such as bridges, viaducts, aqueducts, tunnels, mines, kilns, ice houses, military fortifications, air raid shelters, cellars and similar underground ducts and structures.
  • Involves the development of wind turbine(s), including domestic turbines.
  • Will illuminate / cause light spill onto a building, mature tree (see ix), woodland, field hedge, pasture, watercourse, water body, tree line or a known bat roost.
  • Impacts on a watercourse, intertidal area or standing open water (e.g. ponds, reedbeds) excluding ornamental garden fish ponds.
  • Removes, or moves, part / all of a hedge or line of trees (excluding non-native or urban hedges unless > 10m being removed).
  • Is within or may impact on (including impacts on hydrology), a woodland or a substantial area of scrub connected to a woodland or hedge.
  • Involves surgery to or felling of a mature tree with obvious holes, cracks or cavities, dense ivy, deadwood, bird / bat box (i.e. features which may be a bat roost).
  • Involves removal of tussocky (rough) grassland, wet grassland, flower rich grassland or heathland (heather/gorse present).
  • Involves lighting or removal of a tree line, woodland, hedges or pasture within a bat consultation zone within a bat consultation zone e.g., the South Hams SAC Sustenance Zones and Landscape Connectivity Zones (can be viewed on the Devon County Council Environment Viewer “Statutory Sites” layer – please ask the LPA during pre-ap discussions).
  • May impact directly or indirectly (via a watercourse or air pollution pathway) on a designated wildlife site (Special Areas of Conservation, Special Protection Area, Sites of Special Scientific Interest, County Wildlife Site, Local Nature Reserve, Special Verge
  • Has a clear link to increased recreational use of the coast i.e., involves the expansion of or new facilities for kayaks, paddleboarding, wild swimming, personal watercraft, coasteering or other activities, or consists of tourist accommodation directly linked to these activities (please ask the LPA during pre-ap discussions).

Above criteria are from the Devon county council checklist, but give an indication of what might be required in a Bristol checklist.

If you need a screen assessment in Bristol then please do contact us. 

The Misplaced Trust: GPS Tracking Exposes Failures in Waste Management

The Misplaced Trust: GPS Tracking Exposes Failures in Waste Management

  1. Introduction

The escalating volume of waste generated globally presents a formidable challenge to environmental sustainability and public health. In response, principles of the circular economy have gained prominence, advocating for the efficient use of resources and the minimization of waste through practices like recycling and responsible disposal methods such as legal pyrolysis. These approaches aim to transform waste from a burden into a valuable resource, reducing the strain on natural environments and fostering a more sustainable future.1 However, the efficacy of these systems hinges on transparency and accountability throughout the waste management chain.

In recent years, the application of Global Positioning System (GPS) tracking technology has emerged as a powerful tool for scrutinizing the often-opaque world of waste disposal. By attaching small, inconspicuous trackers to discarded items, investigators can monitor their journey from collection to final destination. This technology offers the potential to shed light on the actual practices of waste management companies and to verify whether waste is being handled according to intended procedures and environmental regulations.2 The repeated use of GPS tracking in investigations by journalists, non-governmental organizations, and even parliamentary bodies underscores its value in providing tangible evidence of waste mismanagement that might otherwise remain concealed.

This report aims to present documented instances, supported by credible sources, where GPS tracking has played a pivotal role in revealing two critical forms of waste mismanagement: the disposal of recyclable materials in landfills and the diversion of waste intended for legal pyrolysis to unauthorized and environmentally harmful facilities. By examining these case studies, this analysis seeks to illuminate the realities of current waste management practices and to underscore the urgent need for greater oversight and reform to ensure the integrity of these vital systems.

  1. Case Studies: GPS Tracking Reveals Recyclables Sent to Landfills
  • United States:
  • Del Mar, California (June 2024): The Journey of a Plastic Bottle to a Riverside Landfill:
    In June 2024, a resident of Del Mar, California, Kevin Grold, decided to investigate the fate of his household recycling.17 Driven by a desire to ensure his efforts to recycle were indeed contributing to environmental preservation, Grold purchased an inexpensive GPS tracking device online. He attached this tracker to a plastic water bottle and placed it in his designated recycling bin. The initial tracking data showed the bottle’s journey to a recycling center located in Escondido, seemingly confirming the proper handling of the item. However, Grold continued to monitor the tracker’s location, and several hours later, he observed its movement further north, ultimately pinpointing its final location at a landfill in Riverside.17 This discovery was disheartening for Grold, who viewed recycling as a personal commitment to environmental stewardship.18 He noted information on the website of his recycling service provider, EDCO, which explained that even minimal contamination in a recycling bin could lead to the rejection of an entire load.17 This explanation, coupled with the low national plastic recycling rate of approximately 5% reported by EarthDay.org and I Love A Clean San Diego, prompted Grold to speculate about the possibility of a magnet at the recycling facility accidentally rejecting the bottle with the tracker, or the more concerning possibility that recyclables are not consistently processed as intended.17 Subsequent experiments conducted by Grold with other plastic and cardboard items showed that they did reach recycling centers for processing, but their ultimate destination remained unknown.17 This personal investigation underscores the potential for items seemingly destined for recycling to end up in landfills, raising questions about the efficiency and transparency of the recycling process as experienced by everyday consumers.
  • Los Angeles, California (Ongoing): Tracking Starbucks Single-Use Cups to Orange County Landfills:
    A significant investigation by KCAL News in Los Angeles brought to light the questionable fate of Starbucks single-use plastic cups that consumers diligently place in recycling bins.19 Former high-tech executive Susan Keefe embarked on an experiment to track these ubiquitous cups, which constitute a substantial portion of Starbucks’ sales.19 Keefe placed trackers inside used iced drink cups and deposited them in Starbucks’ own recycling bins. By following the trucks that collected the recyclables, she discovered that a significant number of these cups were ultimately transported to a landfill in Orange County.19 This outcome was far from Keefe’s expectation, as she aimed to see the plastic recycled. KCAL News further conducted their own tracking experiment, placing a tracker in a cup at an East Los Angeles Starbucks. This cup was tracked to a waste transfer center just a mile and a half away, a location experts indicated is often a precursor to landfill disposal.19 Another cup dropped in Hollywood traveled 13 miles to a waste transfer center in Sun Valley that also operates as a materials recovery facility (MRF). A third cup from Beverly Hills ended up 18 miles away at another Sun Valley MRF. While an employee at this facility claimed the plastic items are recovered and shipped out, an expert expressed skepticism about their likelihood of being truly recycled.19 Expanding the scope nationally, CBS News investigative teams tracked 57 cups placed in Starbucks recycling bins across 18 cities. Of these, possible locations were found for 36 cups, with a mere four reaching facilities that appeared to be genuine recovery centers. Alarmingly, 14 cups ended up at locations resembling landfills.19 Starbucks executives acknowledged these findings as “unacceptable” and “disappointing,” suggesting that factors outside their direct control, such as contamination or mixed materials, could explain why the cups do not always reach their intended recycling destinations.19 However, the investigator in the initial KCAL News report asserted that Starbucks is actively misleading the public with their recycling claims.19 In contrast to the findings with the Starbucks cups, a separate instance involved a plastic bottle and an aluminum can deposited in recycling bins at a CBS Broadcast Center, where the bottle was tracked to a recycling center and the can’s last recorded location suggested it might have been crushed for recycling.19 This comprehensive investigation highlights a potential disconnect between the intended recycling pathway for a specific product and its actual fate, raising concerns about corporate responsibility and the effectiveness of recycling programs for certain types of waste.
  • Houston, Texas (October 2022): Plastic Waste from a Recycling Program Ends Up in a Remote Landfill:
    In Houston, Texas, the promise of advanced plastic recycling was put to the test by local activist Brandy Deason.20 Deason participated in the Houston Recycling Collaboration, a public-private partnership that launched with the support of Exxon and advertised its ability to chemically recycle any type of plastic.20 To ascertain the reality of this claim, Deason placed an Apple Tag tracking device in her bagged plastic waste and deposited it at one of the program’s drop-off sites.20 However, an investigation by Inside Climate News and CBS, conducted with Deason’s assistance, revealed a starkly different outcome.20 The tagged plastic bags were tracked to Wright Waste Management, a remote facility situated 20 miles outside of Houston’s downtown area.20 Aerial drone footage of this site showed a vast, open-air pile of trash, strongly suggesting that the plastic waste was being landfilled rather than recycled.20 Adding to the concerning findings, the promised “advanced recycling” facility, which was supposed to enact the chemical recycling process, had not even opened, nearly two years after the program’s launch, and was not expected to be operational until the following year.20 Despite the lack of an operational recycling plant, the Houston Recycling Collaboration had expanded its drop-off locations, a move that, according to the investigation, appeared to be funneling an increasing amount of plastic waste to the Wright facility, which was described as little more than a “glorified landfill”.20 Further scrutiny revealed potential safety hazards at the Wright facility. Experts who spoke to Inside Climate News noted that storing large quantities of plastic waste in the Texas heat could pose a significant fire risk.20 Public records obtained by the news outlets through a documents request showed that the facility had failed fire marshal inspections on three separate occasions between July 2023 and April 2024 due to missing permits related to the storage of hazardous and combustible materials.20 Deason, who consciously tries to minimize her own plastic consumption, expressed her alarm at learning where her unavoidable plastic waste ended up, fearing that a fire at the facility could release poisonous emissions harmful to nearby residents.20 This case illustrates a potential instance where a recycling program, despite its claims of advanced technology, may have been misleading the public, with recyclable materials being directly disposed of in a landfill, accompanied by significant environmental and safety risks.
  • Indianapolis, Indiana (November 2023): Curbside Recycling Tracked, Highlighting Contamination Issues:
    An investigation by WTHR’s 13 Investigates in Indianapolis sought to determine the actual fate of curbside recycling collected from residents.21 Over a three-month period in November 2023, the investigative team collaborated with local families to track their recycling using GPS tracking devices placed inside plastic bottles.21 They also employed undercover cameras and even a drone to follow the recycling trucks from the curb to their final destination.21 The investigation focused on recycling collected by the two largest waste management companies serving central Indiana: Republic Services and Waste Management.21 For Republic Services, trackers placed in recycling bins from households in northeast Indianapolis and the west side of the city were followed to a large property owned by the company on the northwest side of Indianapolis.21 This facility housed both a materials recovery facility (MRF) for processing recyclables and a transfer station for trash. In both instances, the recycling trucks were observed dumping their entire loads inside the MRF, and GPS data confirmed the trackers’ locations within the facility.21 Undercover cameras captured footage of a front loader moving the dumped materials onto the recycling processing line.21 The signal from one tracker stopped within 20 minutes, likely due to the harsh environment of the MRF’s machinery.21 For Waste Management, a tracker placed in a recycling bin near Brownsburg was followed to a large warehouse in an industrial complex in Indianapolis, identified by the tracker’s location as being inside a large pile of recently dumped material.21 Video footage corroborated the presence of this pile and a front loader moving material to a recycling sorting area. The tracker continued to transmit its location from the same spot for five days before the signal ceased.21 Waste Management confirmed this warehouse as their primary recycling processing center for central Indiana.21 Similarly, a tracker placed in a 13News employee’s recycling bin in Westfield also ended up at the same Indianapolis facility, but its journey included a stop at a WM transfer station in Whitestown before being transported to Indianapolis.21 An unexpected finding occurred with a tracker placed in a recycling bin in Morristown. While the Waste Management truck initially appeared to be heading towards a landfill, it ultimately went to a nearby transfer station, and the recyclable material was later transported to Waste Management’s Indianapolis MRF.21 Overall, the investigation provided evidence that the tracked curbside recyclable materials collected by both Republic Services and Waste Management in central Indiana were indeed transported to their respective recycling processing centers.21 Tours of these facilities revealed the processes of sorting and baling recyclable materials for shipment to other companies that would use them to create new products.21 However, the investigation also highlighted a significant issue of contamination, with a substantial percentage of the materials placed in recycling bins being non-recyclable and therefore likely destined for landfills.21 This suggests that while the initial stages of recycling collection and transportation may be functioning as intended, the presence of non-recyclable items in the bins can still lead to waste ending up in landfills.
  • San Diego County, California (July 2024): Tracking Various Plastic Recyclables:
    In another investigation in San Diego County, California, CBS 8 employed Apple AirTags to track the journey of various types of plastic recyclables.22 The experiment involved placing AirTags inside a water bottle, a yogurt container, an orange juice bottle, and a wipes container. These items were then placed in recycling bins in different areas of San Diego County, utilizing different waste pickup companies.22 The goal was to gain insight into the diverse paths that common household recyclables might take after collection. Representatives from “I Love a Clean San Diego” provided context, explaining that the fate of these recyclables could vary significantly. Some might be processed at local facilities and then sold for reuse, while others could be shipped out of the county to different processing centers, potentially even being sold to foreign countries and transported across the ocean. The organization also acknowledged the possibility that some recyclables might ultimately end up in landfills if they cannot be effectively processed or if markets for the recycled materials are not available.22 This experiment underscores the complexity and uncertainty inherent in the recycling process for consumers. Even within the same geographical area, recyclables collected by different companies might follow vastly different routes, with the possibility of landfill disposal remaining a significant concern for a portion of the collected materials. The lack of a single, transparent pathway highlights the need for better tracking and reporting mechanisms to provide consumers with a clearer understanding of where their recycling actually goes.
  • United Kingdom:
  • London (April 2022): Bloomberg Investigation Traces Tesco’s “Recycled” Plastic to Poland: A Bloomberg Quicktake investigation in April 2022 sought to unravel the journey of plastic waste that consumers diligently deposit in recycling bins at Tesco supermarkets in London.10 Bloomberg reporters placed small GPS trackers inside three used plastic items: a vegetable film, a snack pouch, and a Tesco-branded shopping bag. These items were then placed in public-facing recycling collection bins at various Tesco locations across London.23 The ensuing investigation revealed a complex and multi-stage journey that extended far beyond the borders of the UK.23 The trackers showed the plastic waste being transported to large logistics depots outside of London before being trucked to Harwich International Port.23 From there, the waste was shipped across the North Sea to Rotterdam and then continued its journey eastward through Germany into Poland, eventually ending up near the town of Zielona Gora, approximately 700 miles from London.23 In Zielona Gora, the plastic was traced to a waste processing center owned by the Eurokey Recycling Group, a company identified as a “waste broker” rather than a primary recycler.23 Eurokey’s primary function was to sort the various types of plastic waste it received and then send them on to other contractors or buyers for further processing or disposal.23 Bloomberg reporters who visited the Eurokey warehouse observed large bales of plastic film piled up in a gated yard.23 The mayor of Zielona Gora confirmed that the town receives a substantial and continuous flow of garbage from the UK, noting that the lower cost of waste disposal in Poland compared to countries like the UK or Germany made it an attractive destination for waste entrepreneurs.23 He was, however, unaware of the specific fate of the Tesco plastic once it left the Eurokey facility.23 Further investigation into the destinations of the tracked items revealed that the clear vegetable wrap’s signal was lost within London, near the River Thames.23 The tracker in the snack wrapper led to a factory in East Poland operated by Stella Pack SA, a manufacturer of plastic bags. Stella Pack reported that they sort, melt, and granulate the received waste to produce recycled garbage bags, with any unsuitable plastic being incinerated to generate power for the facility.23 The tracker in the Tesco carrier bag stopped transmitting its location in Zielona Gora. However, subsequent inquiries revealed that an unmarked truck leaving the Eurokey warehouse was traveling east towards one of the largest cement factories in the region. Lafarge SA, a major cement producer, confirmed that their plant near Inowroclaw uses waste, including plastic, as a significant source of fuel, with Eurokey being one of their suppliers through a broker. Lafarge considers this “waste-to-energy” process a sustainable solution due to the high temperatures in their kilns, which they claim destroy even harmful toxins.23 Critics, however, point out that burning plastic still contributes to carbon dioxide emissions.23 Adding to the complexity, two former Eurokey employees in Poland claimed to have witnessed low-quality Tesco plastic being disposed of in landfills, sometimes misclassified as Polish domestic waste, although Eurokey denied these allegations.23 The investigation also revealed that the tracker in the Tesco bag later showed a signal from southern Turkey, in an industrial zone near Adana, approximately 2,000 miles from London. The plastic had been purchased by a recycling company called IMO Plastik, which initially reported that they would attempt to recycle as much as possible, despite the poor quality of the bales received from Europe. Experts expressed doubt about this high recovery claim, and the manager later denied accepting exports, contradicting the tracker data.23 This intricate journey, involving numerous intermediaries and crossing international borders, highlights the significant challenges in ensuring that plastic waste deposited for recycling in the UK is indeed recycled effectively and sustainably, with a considerable portion potentially ending up incinerated or in landfills abroad.
  1. Case Studies: GPS Tracking Uncovers Waste Sent to Illegal Pyrolysis Facilities
  • United Kingdom to India:
  • BBC Investigation (March 2025): Millions of UK Tyres Meant for Recycling Found in Unregulated Pyrolysis Plants in India:
    A comprehensive investigation conducted by BBC’s File on 4 in collaboration with journalism group SourceMaterial in March 2025 uncovered a disturbing practice: millions of end-of-life tyres exported from the United Kingdom to India under the pretense of recycling are instead being incinerated in makeshift and illegal pyrolysis facilities.4 The investigation revealed that the UK produces approximately 50 million waste tyres each year, with nearly half of this volume being shipped abroad, predominantly to India.4 Within the tyre recycling industry, it is reportedly an “open secret” that a significant proportion of these exported tyres do not end up in legitimate recycling facilities.4 The Tyre Recovery Association (TRA) estimates that around 70 percent of imported tyres in India are diverted to unlicensed pyrolysis plants.4 These unregulated facilities typically employ rudimentary batch pyrolysis, a process involving heating tyres to around 500 degrees Celsius in an oxygen-free environment to extract steel, small quantities of oil, and carbon black.4 However, due to the lack of pollution control measures and regulatory oversight, this process releases substantial amounts of toxic gases and hazardous chemicals into the environment.4 The emissions from these illegal operations have been shown to contaminate local water sources, degrade surrounding vegetation, and contribute to severe respiratory conditions among residents living nearby, who report chronic coughs, eye irritation, and difficulty breathing due to prolonged exposure to soot and chemical fumes.4 To track the supply chain of these exported tyres, the BBC, in collaboration with SourceMaterial, strategically placed hidden GPS tracking devices within tyre shipments originating from the UK.4 The data from these trackers unequivocally demonstrated that the tyres reached illegal pyrolysis sites located in remote areas of India, where they were subsequently burned under unsafe conditions, releasing harmful pollutants into the atmosphere.4 The investigation also highlighted a tragic incident in January 2025, when an explosion at one such illegal pyrolysis plant in Wada, near Mumbai, resulted in the deaths of four people, including two children.4 This particular plant was reportedly processing tyres sourced from Europe and lacked even basic safety protocols.4 Following this fatal incident, local authorities shut down seven similar plants in the region.4 However, environmental activists estimate that hundreds of illegal pyrolysis facilities continue to operate across India, exacerbating the country’s air pollution crisis.4 Although the Indian government has officially banned the use of imported tyres in pyrolysis, the investigation revealed that enforcement of this ban has been weak.4 An environmental lawyer interviewed by the BBC estimated that roughly half of the approximately 2,000 pyrolysis plants operating in India are unlicensed, rendering meaningful pollution control nearly impossible.4 This investigation starkly illustrates a significant case of international waste crime, where waste intended for legitimate recycling processes is instead being diverted to illegal and highly polluting facilities, with severe consequences for both the environment and public health in India.
  • UK Parliamentary Debate (April 2025): Discussion on Illegal and Hazardous Processing of Exported Tyres:
    The findings of the BBC investigation into the export of UK waste tyres to India for illegal pyrolysis were further corroborated and discussed during a Westminster Hall debate in the UK Parliament on April 29, 2025.7 Members of Parliament (MPs) convened to address the urgent need for reforms in the management of end-of-life tyres in the UK, with a particular focus on the environmental, health, and economic concerns associated with the export of approximately 350,000 tonnes of used tyres annually to India.7 During the debate, concerns were raised regarding the illegal and hazardous processing of these exported tyres in primitive batch pyrolysis plants in India, where lax environmental enforcement allows for the production of high-sulphur heavy fuel oils and low-grade carbon black, often accompanied by the release of harmful emissions without any filtration.7 Evidence derived from GPS tracking studies was specifically referenced during the debate, consistently demonstrating that tyres exported from the UK were ending up in unregulated facilities, confirming the findings of the BBC investigation.7 MPs highlighted several deficiencies in the UK’s regulatory framework that facilitate this illegal trade, including the classification of end-of-life tyres as “green list waste,” which makes them difficult to track and regulate, and the T8 waste exemption, which allows operators to self-certify without the need for permits, thereby facilitating unregulated exports.7 The debate also touched upon the unused powers granted by the Environment Act 2021, which were intended to enhance the tracking and management of waste exports.7 Tessa Munt MP specifically called for the urgent removal of tyres from the green list, stricter licensing requirements for exporters, and more rigorous enforcement of existing laws.7 The debate also drew attention to the successful legislation implemented in Australia, which requires tyres to be shredded before export, coupled with strict licensing and verification schemes, as a potential model for the UK to emulate.7 This parliamentary discussion underscores the recognition at a policy level of the problem of UK tyre exports ending up in illegal pyrolysis facilities in India, with GPS tracking evidence playing a crucial role in informing this concern and prompting consideration of stronger regulatory measures.
  1. Analysis and Implications

The case studies presented above reveal several concerning patterns in waste management practices across different geographical locations and waste streams. A notable theme is the geographical disparity in the nature of mismanagement. In developed nations like the United States and the United Kingdom, instances of recyclables being sent to landfills are more prevalent, often linked to contamination, economic factors, and the complexities of sorting mixed waste streams. In contrast, the case of tyre exports from the UK to India highlights a scenario where waste is intentionally diverted to illegal and environmentally damaging processing facilities in a developing country, driven by economic incentives and weaker regulatory oversight.4

The types of waste tracked also provide valuable insights. Plastic waste consistently features in cases of recyclables ending up in landfills 17, suggesting inherent challenges in the collection, sorting, and economic viability of recycling various types of plastics. Similarly, end-of-life tyres represent a significant waste stream prone to illegal disposal methods like unregulated pyrolysis.4

The crucial role of investigative journalism in uncovering these instances of waste mismanagement cannot be overstated.4 These investigations, often utilizing GPS tracking as a primary tool, have brought to light practices that might otherwise remain hidden from public scrutiny and regulatory bodies, suggesting potential gaps in official oversight and monitoring mechanisms.

Economic factors appear to play a significant role in driving waste mismanagement. The lower costs associated with landfill disposal compared to the complexities and costs of recycling can incentivize the former, especially when contamination issues arise.17 Similarly, the financial benefits of exporting waste to countries with lower disposal costs and less stringent environmental regulations can motivate the diversion of waste to illegal facilities like the tyre pyrolysis plants in India.4

A recurring theme across the case studies is the presence of regulatory weaknesses and inadequate enforcement that enable these illegal practices to persist. Loopholes in regulations, such as the UK’s classification of tyres as “green list waste” and the T8 waste exemption 7, can be exploited to facilitate the export of waste for improper disposal. Furthermore, even when regulations are in place, as with the ban on imported tyres for pyrolysis in India, weak enforcement can render these regulations ineffective.4

The environmental and health consequences of mismanaged waste are significant. Landfills, while a necessary part of waste management, can contribute to land use issues, generate leachate that can contaminate soil and groundwater, and release greenhouse gases like methane.24 The presence of plastics in landfills poses particular concerns due to their slow degradation and potential to leach harmful chemicals.17 Illegal pyrolysis, as evidenced by the tyre burning in India, results in severe air and water pollution, soil contamination, and significant health problems for local populations, including respiratory illnesses and eye irritation.4 The potential for fires in large piles of plastic waste, as highlighted in the Houston case, further underscores the environmental risks associated with improper waste handling.20

Addressing these issues requires a focus on the regulatory landscape. The UK’s classification of end-of-life tyres as “green list waste” under waste shipment regulations makes it difficult to track their movement and ensure proper disposal.7 This classification contrasts with the environmental and health risks associated with their illegal processing. The T8 waste exemption in the UK further complicates matters by allowing smaller operators to store and process up to 40 tonnes of tyres weekly without requiring a full environmental permit.7 This exemption has been identified as a loophole that less responsible operators can exploit to export baled tyres to countries like India for use in rudimentary batch pyrolysis plants.13 The Australian government’s approach, which involves requiring tyres to be shredded before export and implementing a system of notification and licensing for exporters, offers a potential solution by making it more difficult for whole tyres to be used in illegal pyrolysis plants.7 While India has banned the use of imported tyres for pyrolysis, the weak enforcement of this ban allows hundreds of illegal facilities to continue operating.4

Ultimately, greater transparency and accountability are paramount in the waste management industry.10 The discrepancies revealed by GPS tracking investigations between intended disposal methods and actual outcomes erode public trust in recycling programs and waste management companies.19 The implementation of mandatory digital waste tracking systems, such as the one planned for the UK starting in April 2025 25, holds promise for improving the ability to monitor waste movements and reduce waste crime. Such systems aim to create a centralized database where all waste data is stored, allowing for better tracking from the point of origin to the final destination.25 Technologies like GPS tracking, sensor-equipped bins, and RFID tags can contribute to this enhanced transparency by providing real-time data on the location and status of waste throughout the management process.24

To better understand the scope of waste mismanagement uncovered by GPS tracking, the following table summarizes the key incidents discussed in this report:

 

Location Date (Approx.) Type of Waste Tracked Intended Destination Actual Destination Source (Snippet IDs)
Del Mar, CA June 2024 Plastic Bottle Recycling Center Landfill CBS 8 17
Orange County, CA Ongoing Starbucks Cups Recycling Bins Landfill KCAL Investigates/CBS News 19
Houston, TX Oct 2022 Bagged Plastic Recycling Program Landfill Futurism/Inside Climate News/CBS 20
Indianapolis, IN Nov 2023 Plastic Bottles Recycling Bins Recycling Facilities (but issue of contamination) WTHR 13 Investigates 21
London, UK Apr 2022 Mixed Soft Plastics Recycling Bins Poland (processing, potential landfill/incineration) Bloomberg 10
UK to India Mar 2025 Waste Tyres Legal Recycling Illegal Pyrolysis Plants BBC News, UK Parliament Hansard, Tyre Recovery Association 4

The regulatory landscape plays a crucial role in preventing waste mismanagement. The following table highlights some of the regulatory issues identified in the report and potential solutions:

 

Regulatory Issue Location/Context Evidence (Snippet IDs) Proposed Solution/Example
“Green List” classification of tyres UK Exports to India 7 Reclassification as “hazardous waste” 5
UK T8 Waste Exemption for Tyres UK Exports to India 7 Removal of the exemption 7
Weak enforcement of pyrolysis ban India (imported tyres) 4 Stronger enforcement by Indian authorities 5
Export of whole tyres UK to India 7 Requirement for shredding before export (Australia’s model) 7
Lack of comprehensive waste tracking UK (general) 25 Implementation of mandatory digital waste tracking 25
  1. Conclusion and Recommendations

The findings from the GPS tracking investigations detailed in this report paint a concerning picture of waste management practices. Numerous instances reveal that materials intended for recycling are ending up in landfills, both domestically in the US and internationally in the case of the UK’s plastic waste. Furthermore, the investigation into UK tyre exports to India has exposed a widespread practice of diverting waste intended for recycling to illegal and highly polluting pyrolysis facilities. These revelations underscore the limitations and failures in current waste management systems and highlight the critical role that technologies like GPS tracking play in bringing these issues to light.

To address these systemic problems, several key recommendations emerge. Governments must implement stricter regulations on waste management practices, including more precise definitions of what constitutes “recyclable” and the establishment of robust tracking mechanisms that extend throughout the entire waste management chain. Enhanced enforcement of existing regulations is equally crucial to deter illegal disposal and processing activities, both within national borders and in the context of international waste trade. Specific regulatory loopholes, such as the UK’s T8 waste exemption for tyre exports, must be closed, and international cooperation needs to be strengthened to effectively combat the illegal movement and disposal of waste.

Significant investment in domestic recycling infrastructure is also essential to reduce reliance on waste exports and to ensure that recyclable materials are processed properly and sustainably. This includes supporting the development and adoption of advanced sorting technologies and innovative recycling methods. While traditional pyrolysis in unregulated settings has proven harmful, the potential of advanced pyrolysis technologies in legal and strictly controlled environments for handling certain types of waste should be explored.26

The continued use and expansion of technologies like GPS tracking are vital for improving waste monitoring and detecting instances of mismanagement. Furthermore, the adoption of other technologies such as sensor-equipped bins, RFID tracking, and comprehensive digital waste tracking systems can contribute significantly to enhancing transparency and accountability across the waste management sector.24

In conclusion, the evidence presented in this report underscores the urgent need for comprehensive reforms in waste management practices. The findings from GPS tracking investigations serve as a stark reminder that the intended pathways for waste disposal are not always followed, with potentially serious environmental and health consequences. Policymakers, industry stakeholders, and consumers must work collaboratively to implement stricter regulations, enhance enforcement, invest in sustainable infrastructure, and leverage technology to ensure a more transparent and accountable waste management system that truly protects our environment and public health.

Works cited

  1. Closing the Loop on the World’s Fastest-growing Waste Stream: Electronics | Baker Institute, accessed on May 13, 2025, https://www.bakerinstitute.org/research/closing-loop-worlds-fastest-growing-waste-stream-electronics
  2. Where does America’s e-waste end up? GPS tracker tells all | PBS News, accessed on May 13, 2025, https://www.pbs.org/newshour/science/america-e-waste-gps-tracker-tells-all-earthfix
  3. Hidden GPS Trackers Catch E-Waste Recyclers Exporting Toxic Electronics, accessed on May 13, 2025, https://incompliancemag.com/hidden-gps-trackers-catch-e-waste-recyclers/
  4. What links UK tyre exports to India’s toxic air and black market plants …, accessed on May 13, 2025, https://www.business-standard.com/health/uk-tyre-waste-india-pollution-pyrolysis-health-crisis-125032700522_1.html
  5. INDIA: The world’s dumping ground for waste tyres? – greaterkashmir, accessed on May 13, 2025, https://www.greaterkashmir.com/national/india-the-worlds-dumping-ground-for-waste-tyres/
  6. India: World’s dumping ground for waste tyres? – greaterkashmir, accessed on May 13, 2025, https://www.greaterkashmir.com/latest-news/india-worlds-dumping-ground-for-waste-tyres/
  7. 29th April 2025 – UK Parliament Considers Reforms to Strengthen Circular Economy for Tyres – TyreNews.co.uk, accessed on May 13, 2025, https://www.tyrenews.co.uk/news/parliament-considers-reforms-to-strengthen-circular-economy-for-tyres
  8. GPS Tracking Reveals U.S. E-Waste May Be Exported Illegally – Popular Mechanics, accessed on May 13, 2025, https://www.popularmechanics.com/technology/a20878/investigators-used-gps-to-track-us-toxic-electronic-waste-exports/
  9. Monitour: Tracking global routes of electronic waste | Request PDF – ResearchGate, accessed on May 13, 2025, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/321013996_Monitour_Tracking_global_routes_of_electronic_waste
  10. Tracking Devices Reveal Where Recycling Really Goes – YouTube, accessed on May 13, 2025, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hmGrI_BVlnc
  11. Monitour: Tracking global routes of electronic waste – MIT Senseable City Lab, accessed on May 13, 2025, https://senseable.mit.edu/papers/pdf/20171206_Lee-etal_Monitour_WasteManagement.pdf
  12. The deployment of electronic tracking devices to detect and prevent waste crime – SEPA, accessed on May 13, 2025, https://www.sepa.org.uk/media/407037/lsw-b7-waste-flow-tracking-devices-report.pdf
  13. Recycling of Tyres – Hansard – UK Parliament, accessed on May 13, 2025, https://hansard.parliament.uk/commons/2025-04-29/debates/DF1C0690-5CAF-4B76-98FC-49F46D94ED16/RecyclingOfTyres
  14. Westminster Hall Debate in Full | Tyre and Rubber Recycling, accessed on May 13, 2025, https://www.tyreandrubberrecycling.com/articles/features/regulations-and-legislation/westminster-hall-debate-in-full/
  15. BBC Investigation: Millions of end-of-life tyres exported to illegal pyrolysis facilities, accessed on May 13, 2025, https://resource.co/article/bbc-investigation-millions-end-life-tyres-exported-illegal-pyrolysis-facilities
  16. Waste Management | Asian and Pacific Centre for Transfer of Technology – Apctt, accessed on May 13, 2025, https://apctt.org/vatis_update/waste-management-2
  17. This man put a GPS tracker in his recycling. Here’s where it ended up. – YouTube, accessed on May 13, 2025, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GK8mHhVngto
  18. This man put a GPS tracker in his recycling. Here’s where it … – CBS 8, accessed on May 13, 2025, https://www.cbs8.com/article/news/local/working-for-you/man-uses-gps-tracker-to-follow-plastic-recyclables/509-a16b8e3f-0b89-4911-be6d-8445d427d3bb
  19. Tracking where Starbucks single-use cups actually end up when …, accessed on May 13, 2025, https://www.cbsnews.com/losangeles/news/tracking-where-starbucks-single-use-cups-actually-end-up-when-recycled-kcal-investigations/
  20. Woman Disgusted When She Uses Tracker to See Where Her …, accessed on May 13, 2025, https://futurism.com/the-byte/gps-tracker-plastic-recycling
  21. Is your curbside recycling really being dumped in a landfill? | wthr.com, accessed on May 13, 2025, https://www.wthr.com/article/news/investigations/13-investigates/13-investigates-we-followed-your-curbside-recycling-with-gps-trackers-drones-and-undercover-cameras-heres-where-it-ended-up/531-e84b1de6-a855-412b-b5d6-194fd76cf803
  22. We used Apple AirTags to GPS track our plastic recycling | cbs8.com, accessed on May 13, 2025, https://www.cbs8.com/article/news/local/outreach/earth8/gps-tracking-plastic-recycling/509-0233a3d1-64b0-459c-ace9-49841ed75a7c
  23. Bloomberg investigation traces “recycled” plastic from Tesco in …, accessed on May 13, 2025, https://danwilcock.com/2022/04/14/bloomberg-investigation-traces-recycled-plastic-from-tesco-in-london/
  24. The Evolution of Commercial Rubbish Removal in London’s Business Districts, accessed on May 13, 2025, https://junkbunk.co.uk/blog/the-evolution-of-commercial-rubbish-removal-in-londons-business-districts/
  25. Digital Waste Tracking UK: What It Means and More – First Mile, accessed on May 13, 2025, https://www.thefirstmile.co.uk/the-big-picture/digital-waste-tracking
  26. Clinical Waste Disposal: Methods and Best Practices – The Environmental Blog, accessed on May 13, 2025, https://www.theenvironmentalblog.org/2025/04/clinical-waste-disposal/
  27. Artificial intelligence for waste management in smart cities: a review – PubMed Central, accessed on May 13, 2025, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10169138/
  28. From waste to steady income – Infrastructure Investor, accessed on May 13, 2025, https://www.infrastructureinvestor.com/from-waste-to-steady-income/
  29. Digital Waste Tracking Kicked Down the Road – Tyre and Rubber Recycling, accessed on May 13, 2025, https://www.tyreandrubberrecycling.com/articles/news/digital-waste-tracking-kicked-down-the-road/