Southwest
Environmental Limited| London |
| 02076 920 670 |
| Exeter |
| 01392 927 961 |
| Manchester |
| 01612 970 026 |
| Bristol |
| 01173 270 092 |
If there is one topic that keeps changing, it is nutrient neutrality. We have seldom seen such a "moveable feast" in terms of content requirements by councils, and the latest of these to pop up is the Regulation 77 application.
This is actually not such a bad idea, as it allows developers to seek planning permission for projects already granted "permission in principle" or outline consent, provided they demonstrate nutrient neutrality to prevent harmful nitrate or phosphate runoff into protected waters.
Whilst it might seem like a further layer of complication, it is actually just a different way of looking at the same topic. It is not necessarily good or bad, but because it is a separate process and application in its own right, it may be helpful in that permission can be sought for the nutrient issue as a standalone topic.
We have been working on the nutrient neutrality issue since its appearance around the time of the COVID-19 lockdown. Everything is constantly changing—from the treatment techniques allowable if you are mitigating on-site, to the areas required for mitigation land, the cost and availability of credits, and various changes to the calculation methodologies used by Natural England.
It has been a challenging period, and you should be prepared for the requirements to change during the time it takes to obtain planning permission.
Regulation 77 of the Conservation of Habitats and Species Regulations 2017 (as amended) is a critical compliance checkpoint for developers utilizing general permitted development orders. It requires that any project likely to have a significant effect on a European site (such as SACs, SPAs, or Ramsar sites) must receive written approval from the relevant planning authority before work begins.
While many agricultural and small-scale developments fall under "Permitted Development," these rights are often suspended if the site is within a sensitive catchment or near a protected area. Common triggers include:
To secure a successful Regulation 77 approval, the applicant must usually provide a Shadow Habitats Regulation Assessment (HRA). This document provides the competent authority with the necessary technical evidence to determine that the project will not result in an adverse effect on the integrity of the protected site.
Our team provides the specialized reporting required to bridge the gap between initial design and regulatory approval. By integrating Environmental Impact Assessments with specific agricultural knowledge, we help clients navigate complex planning hurdles. Whether your project involves phosphate mitigation or biodiversity compliance, SWEL offers the technical authority needed to progress your Regulation 77 application efficiently.
With over 15 years of industry experience and a track record of over 900 successful projects across the UK, we ensure your development meets all necessary ecological and legislative standards.